Sponsor

Feed

Categories

Archives


Progress on the nuclear deal despite the Left




Who would have believed that something like this could happen even a month back ? When last year the Prime Minister had declared that his (actually, the Congress party of Sonia Gandhi) was not a one-issue Government, it was taken for granted that with the Left putting a veto on the nuclear deal, and with the allies unwilling to sacrifice the Government for a nuclear deal, the nuclear deal was as good as dead. And even recently, when the Government again raised the issue, it seemed like with the Left unwilling to back down, the deal would not happen, and the entire issue would be political posturing.
And then, suddenly, like a Jack in the Box suddenly popping out, the Congress and the Prime Minister appear to have outsmarted the Left. With the Left even otherwise not leaving a chance to criticize the Government over many issues, the Government must have been chafing at the tone used by the Left (the Congress, even in a coalition Government is never really tolerant of the people providing support). And the political movement by the Congress and the Samajwadi Party must have surprised the CPM and their other left brothers the maximum. They have been so used to being able to turn the heat on the Government that even the slightest hint of alternate support from the SP will be enough to make the Congress stand up and look the left in the eye.


And this is what precisely seems to have happened. The Congress will appreciate the support provided by the 39 MP’s of the SP (vs. the 59 MP’s of the Left); at the same time, the SP is in a bad state in its home state of Uttar Pradesh. Mayawati’s political stars look to be continually on the rise, and the SP really needs an alliance to prevent the split of its votes. And one has to admire its political cunning – in order to avoid the charge of being anti-Muslim and get a reason for changing its stand to a nuclear-deal supporter, it used a meeting with APJ Kalam to showcase as a reason for changing its stand. He is a former President and a missile man, so his support is important to justify a change in stand, and he is a middle class and educated Muslim icon, so this will help mollify its Muslim base.
Where does this leave the Left ? It has an alltime high of 59 MP’s, but Kerala is famous for changing its political mind quickly, and the Left suffered some major reversals in West Bengal local elections, thus ensuring that early next elections could see a much reduced Left MP count. Even now, it could almost seem like that they are no longer relevant.




7 comments to Progress on the nuclear deal despite the Left

  • […] member of the current government in power has not been in favor of the nuclear agreement with USA. The Indian Political Blog writes And then, suddenly, like a Jack in the Box suddenly popping out, the Congress and the Prime […]

  • […] The Indian Political Blog writes: “And then, suddenly, like a Jack in the Box suddenly popping out, the Congress and the Prime Minister appear to have outsmarted the Left.” […]

  • Jay

    These are some serious lingering questions for which UPA doesn’t have answers:
    – Analysis of how much the price of Uranium can rise over 40 years?
    – Does ‘corrective measures’ include signing Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty?
    etc have to be addressed. Otherwise we are being coaxed into deep trouble brother. I feel the UPA headed by Congress needs to be more transparent and discuss the questions and find satisfactory answers to themselves before any further move like signing IAEA safeguards.

    Following are the key questions put forth by the Left parties:
    • In case the U.S. or other countries in the NSG renege on fuel supply assurances for imported reactors, will we have the ability to withdraw these reactors from IAEA safeguards?

    • If U.S./NSG countries renege on fuel supply assurances, can we withdraw our indigenous civilian reactors from IAEA Safeguards?

    • If we have to bring nuclear fuel from the non-safeguarded part of our nuclear programme for these reactors in case of fuel supply assurances not being fulfilled, will we have the ability to take it back again?

    • What are the corrective steps that India can take if fuel supplies are interrupted by the U.S./NSG countries?

    • What are the conditions that India will have to fulfill if the corrective steps are to be put into operation? Once the text of the Safeguards Agreement is approved by the IAEA Board of Governors, which is what the UPA Government seeks to do now, the subsequent steps require no participation at all by the Government of India. It is the U.S. Government that takes the next steps – moving the NSG countries for the waiver and then placing the 123 Agreement before the U.S. Congress.

  • Just about one month ago there held a nuclear deal between India and US which was not easy to accept by all the political leaders of India but finally India got success.

    ————–

    jasmine

  • I am writing a political blog for more than 2 months. Rather dirty politics in india. thru this blog, i am inviting emminent and impeccable people to come forward on a common platform to get rid of corrupt politicians and bureacrats.

  • WHAT IS THE INSTANT UTILITY OF NUCLEAR POWER IN INDIA? WHEREAS INDIA CAN NOT USE THE CONSTANT SOLAR POWER IN ABOVE 6 DECADES?-dr.amrit gaur at: aagassociates.com

  • WHAT IS THE INSTANT UTILITY OF NUCLEAR POWER IN INDIA? WHEREAS INDIA CAN NOT USE THE CONSTANT SOLAR POWER IN ABOVE 6 DECADES?-dr.amrit gaur
    at: aagassociates@ yahoo.com

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>