Introducing medical mercy killing in India ?

A very sensitive subject indeed. Mercy killing, or allowing a person to take his own life (or a team of doctors to do so) is a dilemma that raises ethical questions all over the world. For a world that has derived many of its laws and regulations from religious backgrounds (Ten Commandments / The Gita / The Koran / etc..), mercy killing is something that raises the hackles of a large section of the world’s population. It is only permissible in some countries, and that too under strict control. In many other countries (even one such as the United States), mercy killing has run against a moral hard rock and many physicians have been sentenced for helping in carrying it out. In a recent case of Terry Schiavo (Wikipedia), the case went through major conflict, with people at all levels (politicians, religious figures, family rights groups, etc) getting involved.
The basic premise for mercy killing is simple: There are many medical conditions that are terminal, and there is no established medical treatments that can cure the disease or prevent death. And unlike movies, people don’t dance or sing till almost just before death, they go through horrible phases of steadily declining abilities – losing control of vital motor abilities, losing control of their mental faculties, unable to fend for themselves and being dependent on others, and a steadily increasing pain. In such cases, there has been the logic that given that their condition is terminal (that is, they have reached a condition where death is confirmed and they no longer have a life that seems meaningful in any way), they should be allowed an option to end their life when they still can command control of their life.

Taking the first step towards legalizing euthanasia or mercy killing, the Law Commission has decided to recommend to the government to allow terminally ill to end their lives to relieve them of long suffering. It allows those whose death is virtually certain to avoid their painful journey to the end.
The core of the recommendation to make euthanasia legal stems from several SC judgments which ruled that ‘life does not mean animal existence’. “If a person is unable to take normal care of his body or has lost all the senses and if his real desire is to quit the world, he cannot be compelled to continue with torture and painful life. In such cases, it will indeed be cruel not to permit him to die,” says the report, receiving final touches from Commission chairman Justice A R Lakshmanan.

However, aside from the moral and ethical problems that this issue comes up with, there are many other problems that arise when such a discussion comes up:
– There are a host of new treatments that are arising as we experiment more with genes and new areas such as stem cell technology, so is it right to assume that a condition that is treated as terminal now could not become one where a treatment is possible in a few years
– Who decides whether the condition is terminal ? If it is a team of doctors, who do you trust ? How do you prevent misuse, especially when we have seen so many new cases whereby elderly people are dumped because of the effort of taking care of them
– Will this become a poor vs. rich thing ? Suppose that a very expensive treatment is available abroad, and a poor person cannot afford to get this done for the terminal condition ?
– How will the actual logistics of carrying out the termination of a medically terminally affected patient be carried out ?
– In a country where there are many more needy people than hospital beds, would this become a misused thing ?
What do you people think ? Is India ready for something like mercy killing ?
I agree that we need to do this, subject to some stringent checks and balances.

6 comments to Introducing medical mercy killing in India ?

  • We should get rid of our tradititonal views and understand the problem of a person who is going to die anyways.I think allowing mercy killing will be a better option instead of leaving a person on his own to death.

  • anupama

    Mercy killing should be permissible subject to some legal restrictions to check its misuse as death is any day better than a life of misery & pain.A person who can see his death coming but still egarly waiting for it lying on the bed of pain & grief it will prove to be freedom.

  • People will take the law in their hands and create dramas to kill others. My nation, India should never ever allow mercy killing. God is the one who created us and let him take our soul in his time. There will be great chance to misuse…

  • “Consistently and strongly” opposed mercy killing as a social sin. People have no rights to terminate anyone’s life.

  • Definetely it’l b misused.But wat r u givin to the one who is suffering.Simple logic, wat if any of ur body parts not functioning.Wont u remove that part to avoid infection to other parts.Same rule applies.
    Rev.Ernest Thathapudi – sez people have no rights to terminate anyone’s life.(wat does ‘anyone’ mean – only humans).Are we not killing totally healthy animals just for a feed (Chicken,Mutton,……)Does it sound good feeding all those animals & birds in sophisticated environment and finally kill them and cook in variety of dishes for our pleasure and taste.So where is the QUESTION OF NO RIGHT TO TERMINATE TO ANYONE’S LIFE. why we distinguish humans to animals.

  • Bharati

    Yes, I think mercy killing should be permissible in india. There is no meaning leaving life in pain. Everybody has right to decide about their own life on whether they want to live a happy n healthy life or life that is so painful mentally and physcially both

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>